The reading and lecture both discuss the theory that dionsaurs are enotherms animals or not. While the reading provides three evidences that dinosaurs are endotherms, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that diabsaurs are endotherms because they are living at polar area which is so cold. In addition, only the endotherms who can tolerate this cold enviroment. However, the speaker argues this idea by saying that if they found polar dinasaurs are living in this area that was from long time when this area was more warmer than today. Furthermore, there were many other animals that were not endotherms could live in that cold environment. So, this is not convincing that diansaurs are endotherms.
In addition, the article shows that the leg position underneath of dinasurs as same as the position of endotherms leg. So, dionsaurs are endotherms. On the other hand. the professor rejects this notion by pointing out that this is not accurate to consider dinosaurs are endotherms. This is becasue the dionsaurs used these legs to support their weight. In addition, dinosaurs were growing in large size. So, they used these legs for other advantages than running.
Finally, the reading states that they found haversian canals at dinosaurs fossils structures which is similar to haversian canals at endotherms. In contrast, the speaker contradicts this point by explaining that dinosaur's bone having haversian canals and growth rings that indicates rapid growth followed by stop growth or growth more slowley. In addition, rapid growth then slow growth is considered as a charachteristic of unendotherms. Furthermore, there are many animals other endotherms that can live even at cold envionment. So, dinosaurs are not enotherms.
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The lecture and the passage discuss about the limitation of archarology science. Although the passage claims that the archaeology science has been limited by few financial supporting, job positioning and new foundations to dig, The speaker refutes this id 3
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'warmer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: warmer
...t was from long time when this area was more warmer than today. Furthermore, there were man...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...aurs are endotherms. On the other hand. the professor rejects this notion by pointi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3865248227 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74851977392 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492907801418 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3191556674 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9473684211 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8421052632 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383910249234 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114718629926 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645047679349 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213848979778 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068110381208 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.