The article states that there is a professional painting of Austen's portrait which has come up for sale. However, the professor explains that the evidence and reasons, which prove that the painting is Austen's, are not convincing and he thinks the portrait is loosely connected to Austen's family faces and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the passage declares that her family accepted and recognized the painting as a portrait of Jane. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this point by stating that painting revealed seventy years after Jane's death and her relatives at that time had never seen her because she was not alive and they could not confirm the correctness of the painting.
Second, the article claims that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch. On the other hand, the professor contends that Austen's family is very extensive and vast and many teenagers resemble Jane in her family. Furthermore, there are some pieces of evidence which proved that the painting was one of her relatives' portrait.
Third, the reading avers that the painting was depicted when Austen was a teenager and it was painted by Ozias Humphrey. Nonetheless, the lecture opposes this point by stating that the blank paper of the painting is Wiliam's who came to London when Jane became seventy years old and the portrait can't be depicted when she was a teenager.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL T P O 14 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Forest- TPO14- Salvage logging- Insects 80
- TPO 11 - Integrated : a decline in reading the literature 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...came seventy years old and the portrait cant be depicted when she was a teenager.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05194805195 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50713268211 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6676300498 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456598680584 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205940260846 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684322550184 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279368820504 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630746486804 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.