TPO-15 Cane toads

Essay topics:

TPO-15 Cane toads

The passage states that the cane toad was introduced to Australia deliberately for some agricultural purposes. However, their population has become very noticeable and it is a problem nowadays. The passage explains some strategies to reduce its population but the lecturer says that these methods could not be instrumental and refutes each of them.

First, the passage explains that erecting a fence could helpful for limiting their current habitat. The professor rejects this method by saying that the young toads and the eggs of this specie could distribute to other regions by means of rivers and streams.

Second, the article claims that a human movement consists of volunteers for trapping toads is useful. The professor challenges this idea and claims that the toads are very similar to a kind of native frog. As a result, these untrained volunteers will be harmful for indigenous species.

Third, the passage avers that infecting toads by a specific virus which is only harmful for them could control their number. The lecturer does not confirm this method and says that the virus will lead to some harmful consequences. The virus could be transported to the america, the original habitat of the toads, and it will be devastative for the toads in that region. toad is a native animal in america and its elimination leads to unpleasant environmental issues.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-11 Amin1990 78 view
2018-12-27 Foxman 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Amin1990 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Toad
...vastative for the toads in that region. toad is a native animal in america and its e...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, kind of, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15695067265 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68079685186 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7772016625 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354630599173 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133016597256 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755369947777 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209361101488 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821435175768 0.0443174109184 185% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.