Britain has a long history of human settlement and valuable artifacts that need to be uncovered. Both the author and the lecturer discuss that whether in twentieth-century archaeologist faced with problems for uncovering and studying old artifacts or not. While the passage asserts that they had limitations by some evidenece, the lecturer refutes this claim and provides reasons to the contrary.
First, the passage states that instruction growth caused that many valuable artifacts were lost. In the twentieth century, the population had increased therefore needs for construction increased too and digging for it rendered artifacts damaged. Conversely, the professor says that before any construction, sites should be examined by the archaeologist and if it was valuable they should make a plan to preserve that thus construction could not destroy them.
Second, the author of the reading claims that there was a lack of financial support for archaeologists. They were funded by the government due to changing government priorities their fund had been decreased. The lecturer counters that argument by asserting that archaeologists were funded by construction, not the government. Because, construction was a whole new source for funding archaeologist, shortage of money was no obstacle.
Third, reading mentions that there was difficulties to find an archaelogy job and these job just were to be found at universities or with a few goverments agancies. In opposition to the reading, the speaker clears that construction made a lot of job apportunity for archaeologist like examining new sites, making plans for preserving and processing data.Therefore there was an increas in jobs for archaeologist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...e speaker clears that construction made a lot of job apportunity for archaeologist like exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...lans for preserving and processing data.Therefore there was an increas in jobs for archae...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lans for preserving and processing data.Therefore there was an increas in jobs for archae...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58846153846 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28781820068 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588461538462 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2531530457 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344817134503 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122906961003 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399780172114 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200604918486 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221712829313 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.