TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task
The article explains that the increase in agriculture and pesticide use along with the population increase does the harm to birds in the United States and provides three reasons to support. However, the professor refutes each of the author's points.
First, the reading says that because of the expansion of human populations and settlements, places for birds will continue to disappear. The professor disputes this point by stating that the expansion does not lead to a decrease of all birds. She claims that although the expansion does harm to some species, other species can lead a good life in a city.
Second, the article states that the growth of agriculture with the population increase will also damage the nature of birds. Nonetheless, the professor says that thanks to the improvement in agricultural technology, we don't need to destroy the wilderness as before. According to the professor, we can raise crops more productively now so the need for places for agriculture is decreasing.
Third, the reading says that birds get damaged by chemical pesticides that people use for agriculture. The professor opposes this point by introducing an example of future pesticides. She explains that they are less toxic than the old ones and the best part is that pest-resistance crops invented these days don't harm to birds.
Therefore, the main points made by the professor cast doubt on the main points made in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Shiimaaa | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | HHH | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | thethethethethe | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | Dragut | 70 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | amirakhlaghiqqq | 88 | view |
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task 85
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- PT1 Integrated 3
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rovement in agricultural technology, we dont need to destroy the wilderness as befor...
^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st-resistance crops invented these days dont harm to birds. Therefore, the main p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15744680851 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78862723018 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536170212766 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8393318956 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314297803078 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111133071772 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111684425033 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154672052801 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855497068347 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.