tpo 19-30
The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about a strategy used by advertising companies which is called buzzing in which some buzzers are recruited in order to advertise products to people. Having considered this, the author believes that the buzzing tactic being highly criticized should be ceased by providing three significant reasons. On the contrary, the speaker, who is a buzzer himself, negates all those three reasons and cites that all those reasons are misleading.
First, both the text and the talk explain about the idea that whether consumers should be aware of the fact that, buzzer are paid to advertise. In this vein, the reading explains that it is a huge difference if a person knows whether someone praises a particular item only because he or she is paid to do so. The speaker, conversely, mentions that it is incorrect to assume that buzzers do not tell the truth. According to the speaker, buzzing is not like ordinary advertisements. Furthermore, it should be accepted that buzzers tell the truth merely because the item they are advertising is good and useful.
Second, both the reading and the lecture discuss the idea that the buzzing strategy may guide the consumers to endorse a product less critically. While the reading provide reason citing that print or media advertisements are accurate and people are not aware about the truthfulness of buzzers, the lecture negates this idea by explaining that people will ask even more questions from the buzzers. According to the speaker, a lot of questions about the price, the service, and the time the product will be used are asked from the buzzers. Therefore, if the item is not good, consumers will not buy that.
Third, both the passage and the talk is about the effect of buzzing on social relationship. According to the author, people will lose trust in others if they find out that something is going on according to a hidden agenda. However, the lecturer states that this idea is nonsense and states that if the products were bad and not usable, the company would not recruit any buzzers. Besides, if it is found out that the products came to be really handy and useful, it will even form a more sincere relationship and due to the good experience people had, people will be even more open to one another.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 10.4613686534 268% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 395.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83291139241 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56467566921 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46582278481 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3140766237 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3125 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365580049373 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113769736981 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402393268332 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216829637145 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223150546987 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.