TPO 28
The passage and the lecture argue whether Perry's expedition to the North Pole was true or not. The reading presents three reasons that support Perry's claim. Whereas, the professor disagrees with these reasons and explains his arguments against them.
First, the passage mentions a committee that investigated Perry's records and equipment. The committee was persuaded that Perry had reached the pole. However, the lecturer states that although there was a committee that was convinced about this expedition, the committee wasn't trustworthy because their investigation wasn't objective. Besides, all of them were close friends of Perry who have a large contribution to the money that he gained.
Second, the reading claims that Perry had reached the North Pole through 37 days. However, the professor doubts with this idea because although a British explorer made the same trek in less than 37 days by using similar equipment, the professor claims unlike Perry, Tom Avery didn't transfer food. Indeed, his food was transferred by airplanes. Thereby, he transferred less weight through his sled. Also, unlike Perry, he has traveled in a favorite air condition.
Third, the reading claims that there are some photos which had taken by Perry and they can prove his travel to the North Pole. However, the lecturer argues with this idea and points out that the photos don't prove anything. Indeed, they belong to 100 years ago in which they were taken by a primitive camera. Therefore, because of the low quality of photos, shadows are blurry and we cannot be confidents about them.
Although the reading presents three reasons to support Perry's claim, the professor disagrees with them and explain why these reasons didn't convince him.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ed about this expedition, the committee wasnt trustworthy because their investigation...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...trustworthy because their investigation wasnt objective. Besides, all of them were cl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rofessor claims unlike Perry, Tom Avery didnt transfer food. Indeed, his food was tra...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...his idea and points out that the photos dont prove anything. Indeed, they belong to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...with them and explain why these reasons didnt convince him.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24100719424 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43927597543 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.598788135 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235912260041 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829453305414 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718251051985 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127132694071 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568865254729 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.