The reading and the lecture are both about the artifacts found in Scotland, called carved stone balls. The author of the reading notices some evidence in order to elaborate the function of them in the past while the lecturer casts doubt the claims made in the article as the following reasons.
First of all, the author believes that the mentioned discoveries were being used in regard to fighting and hunting. In addition, some holes on them have been found in relation to proving the author's idea. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She thinks that any weapons utilized in that time had some signs such as wave whereas these clues have not been observed in the stone balls. Moreover, the surfaces of them are so clear and soft without having symbols of fighting.
Secondly, the author contends that these objects must have been used for weighing and measuring quantities including grain and food. The lecturer refutes this argument. She says that the stones consisted of three distinctive materials such as sand, green and cord; consequently, each of them has different weigh. Thus they were inconvenient for measuring.
Eventually, the author points out that the carved stones illustrate useful evidence for proving social goals. Furthermore, the carves on them shows social information of their owners. The woman on the lecture, on the other hands, has inconsistent opinion from the reading. She suggests, the simplicity of carves on the stones contradicts the standpoint of author. Besides that, none of the stone balls have been buried near the graves of high rank of community while they buried with their most important possession.
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 80
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 80
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 80
- TPO34 integrated 66
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e been found in relation to proving the authors idea. This point is challenged by the l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ntly, each of them has different weigh. Thus they were inconvenient for measuring. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, in addition, such as, first of all, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51945516352 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7350272553 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.875 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952157012332 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315336400494 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279643827482 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587808440601 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035843749657 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.