Recently there has been a tone of debate as to on of the work of Rambrandt. More specifically, in regards to this passage, the writer of passage puts forth on the idea that the painting may not be the work of Rambrandt. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws about the writer's claim. In fact, the lecturer thinks that the painting is one of the Rambrandt' work, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made by the author of the reading text.
First and foremost, the writer states that there is something inconsistent about how the woman dressed in the painting. Some professional in the same field, however, stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening passage, for example, the lecture believes that there is no abnormaly about the woman fur dress. she explains that the woman dress in not part of original painting and does not concern with the work of painter.
One group of scholars, represented by the author, assert that light and shadow in the painting do not fit together. Of course, not all experts in the same field think that this claim is accurate. Again, the lecturer explained that in the original painting everything is realistic and that part of the woman's face is removed from the original painting. she goes on by saying that the original work reflect the way he usually painted.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that the painting is consisting of some parts which glued together. Not surprisingly the professor take issue with this claim by contending that the original painting is consisted from one part and actually that exact type of wood use for the other painting of painter.
To sum up, both author and lecturer hold conflicting idea about the painting. It is so vivid that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feelthat human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feelthat human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...e work of Rambrandt. More specifically, in regards to this passage, the writer of passage put...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...no abnormaly about the woman fur dress. she explains that the woman dress in not pa...
^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... is removed from the original painting. she goes on by saying that the original wor...
^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... argument by positing that the painting is consisting of some parts which glued together. Not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80745341615 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47228376806 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493788819876 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8808793092 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.