TPO 31
The lecture and the reading discuss Sinosauropertyx fossils and structure of these animals. Although the passage claims that the fossil's Sinosauropertyx shows that the animal has feathers, the speakers refute this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the fine lines created after animals dead by decomposition of their skin into fibres. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that we cannot see the same skin decomposed on the other animals that finding their fossils on the same site and same volcano ash. Also, fossils which are discovered in volcanic ash always resemble the skin structure of the animal.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that these fine lines belong to the frills than the feathers, the professor argues that the chemical composition of frill and feather are differents. She explains that feathers contain protein and betacarotene, but frills do not have beta certain. And, the experiments show that the fossil has beta certain; therefore, these fossils remain from feathers.
Finally, although the reading passage says that the position of these feathers is a backbone, the fossils that represent animals could not use these feathers for flying or regulate their body temperature. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that the feathers used for another purpose such as attracting mates. She says that other animals such as peacock have colorful feathers on the backbone to attract another mate. Also, the experiments show that the feathers have colorful like orange and white so that the animals used them to attract their mate.
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 73
- TPO 16 90
- A high school that normally gives students about two months of time off from school during the summer is introducing a new educational requirement for students in eleventh grade (ages 16-17) over the summer, students have the following two options to fulf 73
- TPO 33 80
- Do you agree or disagree? in order to be well-information, a person must get information from many different resource. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38549618321 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59914696463 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538167938931 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4711244924 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290812566713 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107635853609 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046552337563 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170661769969 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460720436539 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.