tpo 32
The passage and the lecturer both discuss "Quackers" which was a sound that heard by the Russian navy. The author in the article believes in three hypotheses which were possible sources of this sound. However, the professor refutes each of them with her reasons. I am going to mention both sides' viewpoints bellow.
First, the passage claims that this sound came from a type of whales when the male wanted to attract females during a courtship ritual. The professor can not accept this reason because she thinks it could not be the sound from whales since whales live near the surface of the water and the sounds came from deep of the ocean. She adds that if they were whales the Russian submarine should be able to detect it on sonar but as we know they could not do it.
Secondly, the author of the passage holds an opinion that it is possible this sound came from another animal, giant squid. This animal lives in the deep altitude of the ocean and was known as fish predator. Nevertheless, the lecturer has the opposite opinion, she states that this animal could not be the sound's source because the sounds were heard several times in the past but not today. However this particular animal is living in that area these days, so if we want to consider the squid as a sound's core, we must be able to hear that sound now but we do not.
Finally, the passage says that it was possible that those days some other country sent their submarine to roam in that zone and that sounds came from that unintentionally. The woman in the lecturer highlights the fact that that thing moved so quickly and changed it's position swiftly, according to the fact that in those times there was not enough technology to build such device with that speed to change direction or the engine worked in a silence which made it unnoticeable. in addition, she mentions that it is not feasible that they have this ability to run away from sonar since it needed great progress in marine science technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...everal times in the past but not today. However this particular animal is living in tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...n a silence which made it unnoticeable. in addition, she mentions that it is not f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 22.412803532 236% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64124293785 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39019944795 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516949152542 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3276808161 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326508648925 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110134148364 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674100026427 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192896165385 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660140668281 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.