TPO 33
The reading specifies that there are three theories that prove the meaning of the carved stone balls( a curious type of artifact). However, the professor explains that the theories are not convincing and provide some evidence and refute all the described points.
First of all, the author states that the carved stone ball used as weapons in hunting or fighting. Moreover, some of the balls have a hole in them and many have grooves on the surface and it is possible people use this hole to swing the stone around or throw it. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes the idea by saying that there are not science founding in using this stone for mentioned purposes. Also, many of the stone balls were broken and cracked but the surface of them was well preserved and showing no damage. Thus, if the stone balls used for hunting, the surface of them must be damage.
Second, based on the reading, the stone balls have a uniform size (70 mm in diameter) and it is plausible that the carved stone balls were used as a primitive system of weights and people us it to measure quantities of grain or other food. Conversely, the lecturer asserts that the mass of carved stone balls was not the same and their texture and density differ from each other. Furthermore, it is a crude possibility that it used for measurement.
Third, according to the reading, the carved stone balls have complex and elaborate designs and it served a social purpose for their owner. In contrast, the mark of many carved stone balls is extremely simple. Additionally, archaeologist did not find this stone in a grave and because of that, it is unlikely people use this stone for stated goals.
- TPO 8 the Chevalier s memoir accuracy 80
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play 73
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 76
- TPO 18 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...apons in hunting or fighting. Moreover, some of the balls have a hole in them and many have...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, thus, well, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71379310345 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42237145625 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506896551724 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9328635107 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.600524949352 0.272083759551 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23159438754 0.0996497079465 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118252697099 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.373372488935 0.162205337803 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975467079619 0.0443174109184 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.