TPO 35
The lecture and the reading passage are both about origin of an old manuscript. While the reading passage states that there are several theories that demonstrate the origin of this ancient manuscript the lecture contradicts these claims and provides evidence to the contrary.
First, the author argues that one theory is that because of scientific subject and secret code of the manuscript, it belongs to Anthomy Ascham. Hence those plants that mentioned in the manuscript are similar with those in Ascham's book. Conversely, the lecturer brings the idea that Ascham was an ordinary scientist and the complexity of the manuscript does not seems to his work.
Second, the passage holds the view that based on the other theories, the manuscript is a fake and has not meaning full context and someone made it to sell for money to a rich people. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that it is not convincing theory because the 16 century's people were not be so complex and they didn't need to make such a complicated book for sell to someone.
Furthermore, according to the passage the last theory is that the handwritten book is a modern fake created by Voynich. However, the professor makes it clear that the date of materials that used for the book can be estimated and the ink and paper materials belong a bout more than 400 years old so, this theory is not compelling.
- Some young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off from school. Which of the following activities would be most beneficial for young people (ages 14-18) to do in their spare time? Why?- Gaining practical work experience either at 70
- Do you agree or disagree?in the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 60
- tpo31 80
- TPO 24 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nuscript, it belongs to Anthomy Ascham. Hence those plants that mentioned in the manu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...e complexity of the manuscript does not seems to his work. Second, the passage hol...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...e complexity of the manuscript does not seems to his work. Second, the passage hol...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... people were not be so complex and they didnt need to make such a complicated book fo...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 370, Rule ID: FOR_SELL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for sale'?
Suggestion: for sale
...nt need to make such a complicated book for sell to someone. Furthermore, according t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87341772152 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57140370305 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2059266147 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.