TPO 35 Integrated Writing Task

The writer of the passage presents three probable explanations for the origin of the book titled 'Voyanich manuscript' , which is written in a seemingly mysterious language. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on each of them.

First, the passage states that the manuscripts could contain important knowledge or magical information, and the anoymous writer intended to encode it through complex language. The passage also suggests a viable candiate. The professor, nevertheless, refutes the idea, she says that the proposed candidate was a run-of-the-mill scientist, and he did not have any original research. Thus, there would be no reason to write down his thoughts in such a wierd language, becasue there was not any authentic knowledge with him.

Second, the passage claims that the manuscripts might have been faked by a deceiptful person, the name of which is mentioned in the passage. He defrauded the elite by pretending to have magical power. On the contrary, the professor rejects the prediction by affording the information that the people were gullible, and he could have done the same with a much less elaborated book! It does not make sense that he would have put that much effort in order to only deceive people.

Ultimatedly, the possibilty that the manuscripts were faked by Voyanch is offered by the reading. Due to Voyanch proficieny in such jobs, he might have done it to resell the manuscripts with higher prices. The lecturer, nonetheless, belives that it is not convincing since the forgery dated at least 400 years ago. Although he may have procured enough old papers, it is implausible that he could have found suitable ink for his purpose.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n of the book titled Voyanich manuscript , which is written in a seemingly mysteri...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, then, thus, at least, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18014705882 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81168878002 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8477357908 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0123231853718 0.272083759551 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00426432227493 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0147720456801 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00720323267077 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124763649645 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.