TPO 36
The reading explains that the cloud seeding process prevents the damage of the hail on farmlands in the United States and three reasons are provided to support. However, from the lecturer's view, the mentioned reasons are not strong enough to be persuasive and she repudiates them all.
The reading states that the experimental results in the laboratory prove this claim. In contrast, the lecturer posits that the mentioned results can only be authentic in the experimental environments. In the real-life circumstances, these ingredients prevent the precipitation that is an undesirable phenomenon. It may cause drought in the near future. Therefore, it will damage the regions for sake of the lack of water.
The author claims that the same experience exists in the Asian countries. Hence, it can be considered as a reliable method. The professor opposes this point by saying that the mentioned effects have been in the urban areas. Such areas have a high amount of air pollution because of traffic and industrial environments in the cities. With the presence of chemical substances, these conditions are favorable for cloud seeding. Since it may not occur in the unpolluted regions like farmlands, this assertion is not compelling.
Based on the article, local studies have presented invaluable information about the cloud seeding. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that the mentioned decline of damage by hail has nothing to do with the cloud seeding. In fact, decreasing the hail causes that storms reduce as well in different directions and this is a natural variation that can not be used as a reason for this purpose.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20454545455 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85371859607 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6377763831 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.875 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.