In the lecture, the professor points out that the possible explanations which made by the author in the reading passage are not plausible to explain the elimination of other species which led to dinosaurs became dominate species at the end of the Triassic period. he points out several imperfections of each explanation made in the reading passage, and he refuses them one by one respectively.
First of all, the author believes that one possible option might be declination of the sea levels which were fluctuating in that time which caused the extinction of countless aquatic species. Nevertheless, professor refutes this statement, he says that species in shallow water were capable to adapt to the environment gradually.
Secondly, the lecturer rejects the claim which made by the author that plenty of volcanoes erupted which released an inordinate amount of SO2 into the atmosphere which made the temperature went down drastically, thus led to the extinction of several species. the professor believes that SO2 which released from volcano activity exist in short time it is mean the SO2 combine with water and oxygen and went down as precipitation, thus it might not be a great explanation of extinction.
Finally, the author believes that asteroid strike might be another explanation of extinction which debris from the strike that led to blocking the sunlight. On the other hand, the professor mentions that scientists haven't found creators which can date at that time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...cies at the end of the Triassic period. he points out several imperfections of eac...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...d to the extinction of several species. the professor believes that SO2 which relea...
^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... the professor mentions that scientists havent found creators which can date at that t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, in short, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22268907563 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8385983695 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516806722689 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1670221304 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.375 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.375 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.