TPO 40
The reading and the lecture are both about the possibility of a permanent human presence on Venus. The passage states that it is impossible to survive on Venus due to the inhospitable conditions on this planet. The lecturer, on the other hand, categorically denies all the three episodes of arguments mentioned in the passage, believing that living on Venus is possible through the use of the station, which is floating like a balloon about 50 kilometers above the surface.
First, the author mentions that atmospheric pressure at Venus’ surface is at least 90 times greater than the pressure at the Earth’s surface. Hence, the human being will be crashed on the surface of this planet. The lecturer challenges this specific argument. He claims that the atmospheric pressure of the 50 kilometers upon the surface of the Venus is equal to the Earth’s pressure. Therefore, the human can live in the station without crushing.
Secondly, the writer suggests that there are no resources for water and oxygen. In the article, it is said that it is impractical to import these materials from the Earth. The lecturer, however, refutes this by mentioning that carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid are available on this planet. Therefore water and oxygen can be produced by the composition of the aforementioned chemical materials. Under such a circumstance, it is not necessary to move water and oxygen from Earth to Venus.
Finally, the author posits that very little sunlight reaches the planet’s surface due to the thick and dense clouds. So, solar power cells cannot be used to get electricity. In contrast, the lecture’s position is that the clouds that fill the atmosphere of Venus are not very thick. Besides, he mentions that the reflected sunlight can be absorbed in the station; therefore, the power of the station can be produced quickly.
- TPO_53. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.— Wait until the class or meet 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- TPO 53 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...inhospitable conditions on this planet. The lecturer, on the other hand, categorica...
^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...uric acid are available on this planet. Therefore water and oxygen can be produced by the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15460526316 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88198259309 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523026315789 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8661628938 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423511082654 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123413198615 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511848691901 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24279938046 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204424381679 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.