TPO 40: Integrated writing task
The main idea of both the reading passage and the lecture is about the possibility of setting a station for the permanent human presence on Venus. While the lecturer claims that there are unsolvable problems regarding this plan, the lecturer proposes a solution which he believes would be able to address the mentioned problems by the author.
First of all, the author mentions atmospheric pressure on Venus's which is 90 times greater than that of earth and hence, anything lands on Venus would be crushed by this pressure. The lecturer proposes the idea of a floating station in Venus's atmosphere 50 Km above its surface. He explains that by increasing altitude the atmospheric pressure reduces and 50 Km above Venus's surface its value is about atmospheric pressure on earth and therefore it would not crush anything.
Secondly, the author states that the main components of Venus's atmosphere are carbon dioxide, sulfuric acid and there is almost not any water or oxygen in it. Therefore, oxygen and water supplies should be delivered to Venus in an adequate amount for establishing a permanent station and it would be impossible and impractical. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that there is some chemical process in which water and oxygen can be produced from compounds such as carbon dioxide or sulfuric acid. The station can take advantage of this and produce its water and oxygen supplies from Venus's atmosphere in a sufficient quantity. Hence, there is no need to import these supplies from the earth.
Finally, the author states thick clouds in Venus's atmosphere reflect back a great percentage of sunlight into space and also the remaining is blocked by a dense layer of carbon dioxide, therefore, it is impossible to use solar power cells to produce electricity for human use on the station. Conversely, the lecturer points out that the clouds above the floating station are not so thick hence the solar power cells on the station can absorb both reflected lights from lower clouds and the passing lights from the thin upper cloud and generate adequate electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | sahar90o | 73 | view |
| 2017-09-05 | hamed.TOEFL1 | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04335260116 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58714918526 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473988439306 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4728937554 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.416666667 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374824495613 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142028834472 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634852840164 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211616997616 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522564041133 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.