TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task

The reading and listening are aruging over the questions whether human are capable to land on the venus' surface. The passage author lists out three main problems for landing. In contrast, the lecturer proposes a way for coping with these problems. He mentions that scientists should think about esablishing a station on the atmospher like a ballon instead of landing on the land.

First, based on the passage, the pressure of venus is too much and it cuases the objects to be crushed. The lecturer, however, states that the pressure of the venus atomospher declines by increasing the height and the station can be established in 15 kilometeres height. At the same height the pressure of the venus' atmospher is as much as the earth. Therefore, there is no dangerous problems for humans and equipments.

Second, the passage author mentions that there is no water, water vapor in venus and it is impossible to transport foods and water regularly from earth to venus. On the contray, the lecturer suggest a solution for this problem. He asserts that there are enough materials lkie carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid in the venus atmospher. In this respect, the austronant are able to produce water with some chemical actions. Hence, the water can be obtained with some chemical actions.

Third, the author believes that the solar power cells cannot be used on the venus surface, since there is not eough solar radiations. Nevertheless, the lecturer point out a station on a top location is a good solution. Since the station in that postion not only receives enough radations from sun directly but also receives the reflected redations by thick clouds on the bottom of the station.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98581560284 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5729436903 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6146165074 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.875 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304798628179 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909562493133 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703838755246 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168671699044 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452429331721 0.0443174109184 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.