The issue both the reading and the listening focus on is the danger of glass for birds, but the listening casts doubt at three main points.
At the first point, the reading states that using one-way glass will help birds avoid flying to the glass. Because the birds cannot see in the building, only people inside the building are able to see. They will understand the window as a solid barrier. According to the listening, this category of glass is as bad as the regular glass. Since the birds will see the glass as a mirror that they do not have the ability to understand.
At the second point, the reading believes that adding colorful lines or other shapes to the window will solve the problem. People are still able to see through the unpainted part of the glass. Birds realize these color stripes; for this reason, they do not try to fly through the glass. On the contrary, the listening argues that birds will see the hole like an open hole; as a result, they still try to get through this hole. If the hole is formed to be smaller to serve the protective purposes for birds, it will be too dark for people inside the building.
At the last point, the reading mentions that using electromagnets will be an effective way to encourage birds away from the building. Because they have the ability to sense a magnetic field of the Earth. However, the listening confirms that birds use magnetic sense just when they travel over a long distance. When moving a short distance such as between cities, they utilize vision’s function to navigate, it is why electromagnets become useless in protection for birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...encourage birds away from the building. Because they have the ability to sense a magnet...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70175438596 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37028906191 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7255955552 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518410984729 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18652569701 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081521392665 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294016760739 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143554183988 0.0443174109184 324% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.