tpo 43
The female professor in the lecture finds there are many weakness in the theories of the reading passage about how the agnostids ate and behaved. In other words, she casts doubt on what the reading passage states. And in the lecture, she uses three convincing points to support her idea.
To begin with, the author of the reading passage gives the first theory that agnostids are free-swimming predators. The speaker, however, refutes that it is not convincing, because of the fact that free-swimming predators always have larger well developed eye, while the agnostid just have a tiny eye and sometimes blind. Apparently, the idea of the reading material is dubious.
Furthermore, contrary to the second theory given by the reading passage that the agnostid may have dwelled on the seafloor, the lecturer claims that seafloor dwellers usually move slow and stay on local area, however, evidence shows that agnostids can move fast and it is easy for they move from one area to another area, which differs from what the reading reveals.
Last but not least, the listening material confute the third theory showed in the reading passage that agnostids are parasites, by pointing out the fact that agnostids have a great size of population so that they may kill they host if they are paresites. Clearly, this is a third point which is in conflict with its counterpart in the reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
- tpo 33 3
- TPO 42 independent writing 3
- TPO-30: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to 60
- Tpo15 81
- Tpo30 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun weakness seems to be countable; consider using: 'many weaknesses'.
Suggestion: many weaknesses
...rofessor in the lecture finds there are many weakness in the theories of the reading passage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...convincing points to support her idea. To begin with, the author of the reading...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ver, refutes that it is not convincing, because of the fact that free-swimming predators always have lar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea of the reading material is dubious. Furthermore, contrary to the second theo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...differs from what the reading reveals. Last but not least, the listening materi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, while, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96551724138 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50099564003 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 98.4349130074 49.2860985944 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318207229859 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117474557771 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940620435321 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193794229266 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508203341577 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.