TPO 43 integrated writing | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

TPO 43 integrated writing

Some controversy has generated about how agnostids may have lived. The lecturer claims that the three theories proposed in the article are weak. However, the article states some explanations for every theory.
The first area of debate is about that agnostids were free-swimming predators or not. In the article, the author mentions that these animals were hunters, and they ate other small animals. Nevertheless, the professor refutes that idea by saying that agnostids had tiny eyes, and if they were hunters, they should have a largely developed vision ability, which was absent. Indeed, she asserts that to became hunters, they might have other sensation abilities that helped them in chasing which no evidence proved that. Therefore the lecture refutes the accuracy of the first theory.

The second point of debate is about if agnostids lived on the seafloor and ate dead organisms or not. Although the article supports that idea, the lecturer casts doubt that by pointing that agnostids could move fast and to migrate to many areas that were unusual to the seafloor animals. The professor again refutes the second theory.

The third part of the controversy is about agnostids were parasites. While the reading supports this point, the lecturer refutes this by saying that was not true because the size of agnostids was large. If they were parasites, the animals which fed on would die, so the size of the population of agnostids disproved this theory.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-03-22	sonyeoso	80	view
2023-02-24	m.ghoroobi	70	view
2023-02-20	m.ghoroobi		view
2022-09-03	Allenwlh	70	view
2022-04-16	lhklin	75	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Integrated TOEFL Writing

Essays by user khadega :

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... chasing which no evidence proved that. Therefore the lecture refutes the accuracy of the...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1512605042 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43845217461 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1589374006 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5714285714 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396146649886 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143472809513 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100785784959 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234058839373 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460208989004 0.0443174109184 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments