TPO-46
In the lecture, speaker argues with all the reasons provided in the text in favor of electronic medical record in United state.
She states that all the advantages claimed in the reading are uncertain.
First, although the reading claimed the electronic record reduce the cost, professor argues with that. She states that the reduction of cost is not significant and not lead to any saving. She illustrates that most physician still keep the paper record for their reference and some records need to have signature. Therefore, cost of storage and space as well as paper record do not eliminate by having electronic record.
Also, the text claimed that electronic record prevent from error of handwriting and improper data. However, the lecturer states that it does not eliminate the erros as physicians use pen and pencil and their handwritting by their hand and the staff usually is in charge of transfering the data to the computer. Therefore, error in handwriting and data would be still an issue in this regard.
Lastly, the speaker refutes the text point about aiding in research. She states that this not nessessarily happens. Medical record in US has a very strict rule and difficult to access because of strict privacy laws in place. A patient can block the use of their data for medical research. For running a research there are lots of rules in place and following them and obtaining many permitted data needs lots of work. Therefore, research might not become easier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, so, still, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53636404324 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540322580645 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2505486505 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232650562805 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779521769796 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620925855408 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12383862987 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074168301131 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.