tpo 46 w task1;
The reading and the lecture both discuss the use of electronic medical record system superseding the open ways of archiving medical records of patients, while the text describes it very useful; The professor thinks it is not that beneficiary and the users will still face the open problems.
The reading alleged that by using the new method costs of keeping and storing will drop drametically because they will take no place and they are all recorded on a computer in a database. Nevertheless, the teacher had claimed that it is not that beneficiary that the reading suggests because still doctors use the paper and write in them in the case of either emergency or referencing or even when they need the signature on it for privacy issues.
The other reasons why the reading suggests that using electronic records is booming is preventing errors such as illegible handwriting, improper transcription and nonstandard organization of paper records which in some cases even caused a sever result for the patients' health. On the other hand, the professor asserts that doctors while giving prescriptions to patients they use stylus and paper. And later on, their assistance will register the information and preserve it on the computer and that person will still face the old challenges.
In the long run, the reading believes that electronic medical records will help to research due to ease of accessing to information and excavating patients records of different doctors and hospitals quickly. Whereas the teacher talks about United States policy of obtaining medical records of patients which need the patient's legitimacy for accessing. Moreover, it is a complex and unwieldy procedure that will not be easy as the reading suggests. Furthermore, the patient can also block access to her/his records.
- TPO 41.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing TaskBurning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmf 80
- TPO 36 3
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing TaskAgnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...ases even caused a sever result for the patients health. On the other hand, the professo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they use stylus and paper. And later on, their assistance will register the infor...
^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...ical records of patients which need the patients legitimacy for accessing. Moreover, it ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, whereas, while, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19931271478 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75294839427 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529209621993 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.06355379 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.3 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415002096593 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16036530915 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117930527567 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253794397227 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894075991222 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.