TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task

the main topic of both resources is about frogs extinction. the passage author after mentioning its consequences like preventing disease carrying insects to be in touch with people by eating them, presents number of solutions for avoiding this problem which lecturer does not agree with any of them.

first, according to author, frogs are getting injured from some chemical poisons people use to prevent insects from their crops, but the lecturer does not agree with this idea and acclaim that farmers are in competition to sell their products and if government set strict rules for some of them who have farms near to danger frogs ecosystem it would not be fair and also they would lose more crops.

secondly, it was mentioned in the passage that this problem is because the fungus make frogs skin thick and they lose their way to absorb water, so they die of dehydration and we need to apply treatments that kill fungus, by contrast, the lecturer mentioned that this treatment should be applied individually and in a large scale also it would be hard and not practical plus it does not prevent them completely and we should do the treatment again for each new generation and it would be expensive and complicated.

finally, as author asserts frogs natural habitats like laying their eggs into water put their population in decline, because human activities make water not suitable for them. so humans should protect lakes and marshes better. the lecturer, conversely acclaimed its not a real cause, because global warming disappears waters and it is not practical if people prevent themselves to use water.

all in all, all of the points in the passage are destroyed by the lecturer.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the main topic of both resources is about f...
^^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...th resources is about frogs extinction. the passage author after mentioning its con...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...rer does not agree with any of them. first, according to author, frogs are getting...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...jured from some chemical poisons people use to prevent insects from their crops, bu...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...and also they would lose more crops. secondly, it was mentioned in the passage that t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
... would be expensive and complicated. finally, as author asserts frogs natural habita...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ities make water not suitable for them. so humans should protect lakes and marshes...
^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hould protect lakes and marshes better. the lecturer, conversely acclaimed its not ...
^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ter. the lecturer, conversely acclaimed its not a real cause, because global warmin...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: All
...ple prevent themselves to use water. all in all, all of the points in the passag...
^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...themselves to use water. all in all, all of the points in the passage are destroyed by ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97887323944 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48395965034 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 157.545033244 49.2860985944 320% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.75 110.228320801 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 21.698381199 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346725452525 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139045128102 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922077461969 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172367087751 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101165655314 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.3589403974 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.