tpo-55 integrated
The reading and the lecture are both about the benefits or possibilities of using a new-invented box-shaped device to help grow trees in deserts to prevent desertification. Whereas according to the reading, some scientists believe that this method can't be successful to maintain the trees in harsh conditions and bring three reasons for support, the lecturer refutes each of the reasons and states that the proposed idea can be efficient.
To begin with, according to the passage the opposing scientists state that using this device for each tree is very expensive and out of the ability of some poor countries. However, the lecturer disputes this statement. She mentions that each tree needs a water-collecting device just during the early stages of growth. To explain more, after the tree becomes big enough to stand the condition by its roots, they can remove the device to use it for another tree. So, this opportunity to reuse them make its usage more affordable. According to the lecture, this device even can be used more than twenty times.
Second, the reading claims that most of the people in places that are in danger of desertification, are poor and depend on other vegetation for food. So, persuading these people to take care of non-beneficial trees is difficult. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this point. She mentions that there can be other rewards for local people as motivation. For example, some extra devices should be given to farmers to use in their food-resource vegetations. In addition, after trees become grown enough, there will be more branches as firewood for locals.
Finally, the passage argues that the capability of the collecting device is limited and will not cover a fully-grown tree's need for water. On the contrary, the lecturer rejects this argument by saying that each tree needs surface-added water or irrigation when is small. In other words, during the growing period roots penetrate through the soil as far as that will be no longer dependent on water from the surface since the tree now has access to underground water in deep layers. For instance, she points out that more than 90% of trees planted in the Sahara still survived in very harsh and arid conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | Fateme_mhd | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | Ali Talaei | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | sam037 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | Aliakbari94 | 65 | view |
| 2020-10-13 | Ayshan saleki | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- TPO 64 Integrated 80
- Movies and televisions have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ome scientists believe that this method cant be successful to maintain the trees in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03260869565 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75934997551 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.132669126 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478967419641 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150564119982 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686291183679 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308473934588 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305800452439 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ome scientists believe that this method cant be successful to maintain the trees in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03260869565 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75934997551 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.132669126 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478967419641 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150564119982 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686291183679 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308473934588 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305800452439 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.