TPO 56

Essay topics:

TPO 56

In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecturer discuss a new sound produces by a special whale; hence, scientists named this whale a 52-hertz whale. Although the reading provides three theories to explains this phenomenon, the speaker refutes these ideas through several reasons, which will be described in this report.

To start off, the passage points out that two different kinds of whales produce a kid that scientists name a hybrid. The hybrid gains some characteristics from a parent, and produce this sound. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the migration pattern of the 52-hertz whale is too unusual. He explains that a hybrid also follows their parent migration pattern, and they travel together. Nevertheless, the 52-hertz whale does not migrate like other whales. When scientists follow the voice of the 52-hertz whale they understand that this whale migrates alone, and has a specific migration pattern.

Going through the next approach, the reading passage states that the 25-hertz whale may have a damaged sense of hearing, and this whale cannot listen to other whales, so produce its own sounds. However, the professor argues that having a different song cannot explain the damage to the hearing system. Because physical structure says that producing songs depend on the throw structure, and unusual throw structure cannot relate to the damage. Also, this animal does not have a connection between hearing and throw structures.

Finally, although the passage says that the 52-hertz whale would become a member of a rare species that stay alive, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the 52-hertz whale was rare, but this whale must have parents that produce high pitch sound like their children. But, scientists use the technology for several decades that hear the sound's whales, and they never hear this kind of sound before this one.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sounds'' or 'sound's'?
Suggestion: sounds'; sound's
...ology for several decades that hear the sounds whales, and they never hear this kind o...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, in contrast, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26557377049 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45106035333 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.458969191 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0518297723957 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0220274950538 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0149716690114 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0370482983769 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131455667645 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.