TPO10 integrated writing
The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about which can better explain the decline of sea otters, environmental pollution or predation theory. The author believes that it is the environmental pollution that causes this problem, which is contradicted by the following lecture.
For starters, the writer claims that there are some sources of pollution known by people while the professor views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, actually people have not found dead sea otters washing off the beaches. That is, if this decline is due to contamination, it is strange that there is not any remnant of dead bodies. Yet, if the cause is predators, they would be eaten immediately, which could explain the absence of remnants.
In addition, the passage states that only environmental pollution can lead to entire drop. However, the speaker opposes this view by saying that because whales have been hunted by human, orcas are forced to change their diet. In this situation, the small sea mammals, such as sea lions and sea otters, who are available, become their alternative prey. Thus, small mammals population shrink as well.
Finally, the writer argues that the uneven concentration of pollutants accounts for the uneven pattern of decline. By contrast, in accordance with the professor, this opinion does not hold water. In fact, the uneven pattern is better explained by the predation theory. Sea otters are more likely to die in those locations that orcas can access easily. However, because orcas are so large, they cannot access shallow or rocky locations. And shallow and rocky locations are precisely the types of locations where sea otter populations have not declined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-10 | Angelina2016 | 65 | view |
| 2017-03-09 | Angelina2016 | 70 | view |
- A D People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 90
- learn history courses 83
- 34 integreted writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to work in a large company than in a small one. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO44-W1 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this decline is due to contamination, it is strange that there is not any remnant...
^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
...ome their alternative prey. Thus, small mammals population shrink as well. Finally, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2202166065 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64529561993 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.126815298 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324353825221 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944671847274 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443579835672 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184703327732 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163822096534 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.