TPO12

Essay topics:

TPO12

The lecture and the article are both about the portrait of Jane Austen who was a famous novelist. There is not any picture of Jane just a portrait and a weak sketch of her face. The reading feels that although painting has not any painter signature, it would be belong to Austin and provide three possible explanations. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the article. He claims that these explanations are faulty.

To begin with, the author states that the Austin's family conformed that the portrait was belong to Austin in 1882. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer, he is of the opinion that the relatives of the Austin proved the Austin's portrait 70 years after her death and probably they had not seen the Austin at all.

Secondly, the author suggests that the similarity between the sketch and the portrait is very surprising and the similarity can show that the portrait and the sketch are belong to one person. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that the Austin’s family was very large and the Austin’s cousins were similar to her and they were at the same age.

Last but not least, the writer posits that the working period of painter was synchronized with teenager ages of Austin. In contrast, the lecturer position is that the painter canvas that used for this painting was purchased when the Austin was 27 years old.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-29 bkukx 80 view
2020-03-13 Manjushree 80 view
2020-02-22 eeemmmyyy 73 view
2020-02-21 sarkar 70 view
2020-02-21 sarkar 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
... family conformed that the portrait was belong to Austin in 1882. The specific argumen...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ity between the sketch and the portrait is very surprising and the similarity can ...
^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ow that the portrait and the sketch are belong to one person. The lecture, however, re...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89830508475 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50289619658 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521186440678 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.858578837 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.090909091 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255894756413 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102238551379 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817502518666 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151104168172 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571049913395 0.0443174109184 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.