Tpo16
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss facts that are related to the science of archeology in Britain. The passage states that there are lots of limitation for using this science in the old artifacts of Britain. It gives several reasons for this argument; however, the professor, in the lecture, does not concur with the author's deduction. She presents three pieces of evidences to support the fact that new guide line which has been established from 1990 solves these problems.
In the first place, it can be deduced from the reading that lots of valuable artifacts have been destroyed since construction projects started in this location and they devastated artifacts. This point is challenged by the speaker. She points out that the new guide line posits that construction project's location should be examined by archeologist before the start of construction and also if the archeologists credit the archeology value of site, the region should be preserved.
Moreover, that lack of financial support from government for archeological affairs is derived from the text. At the same time, from the listening, it can be inferred that construction companies, as a new source of financial support, give credit to the archeological researches.
The final point, presented in the article, is that no job vacancies in the archeology field make people change their mind to be archeologists. The lecture, on the other hand, casts doubt on the mentioned point by taking to the account of the fact that new guide line create conditions that in them archeologists should be hired for finding, preserving and analyzing the artifacts.
All in all, the reading section and the listening section both are about role of archeology in Britain's artifacts. The professor effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-09 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | miss.yusufi | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | supergirl20 | 40 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | hosna69 | 90 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | birkiy | 90 | view |
- which one is better for students during breaks? taking different courses or doing voluntarily work to improving the aspects of life in city's universities. 90
- Tpo39 3
- Tpo12 76
- do you agree or disagree?parents have to allow their children to play with video games. 90
- TPO 1 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and ex 75
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 293 250
No. of Characters: 1492 1200
No. of Different Words: 156 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.092 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.785 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.538 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.361 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.385 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.342 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n the lecture, does not concur with the authors deduction. She presents three pieces of...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'in the first place', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294117647059 0.261695866417 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.151702786378 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0495356037152 0.0723426182421 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.015479876161 0.0435111971325 36% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0247678018576 0.0277247811725 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.160990712074 0.128828473217 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0650154798762 0.0370669169778 175% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86918890774 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015479876161 0.0208969081088 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0030959752322 0.00154638098197 200% => OK
Determiners: 0.145510835913 0.128158765124 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015479876161 0.0158828679856 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0061919504644 0.0114777025283 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1817.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 293.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20136518771 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368600682594 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300341296928 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225255972696 0.187439937562 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160409556314 0.113142543107 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86918890774 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.0346541826 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5384615385 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5494641887 49.3711431718 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.769230769 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.615384615385 0.878197800319 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 52.5725912313 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.70967741935 1.90840788429 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.612409463163 0.549887131256 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144650223573 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0961600400628 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.697844598764 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140938190898 0.139662658121 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.32056774339 0.266732575781 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884025102072 0.103435571967 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410410067738 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0576456827805 0.0530846634433 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.446169208762 0.40443939384 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485325945643 0.0528353158467 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.