TPO1
Employee, four-day workweek, united states, 80 percent, four-fifth
In this set of material, both the author and the lecturer are discussing pros and cons of changing five days work to four days work in a week for employees in the United States. Whereas the author of the reading states that the country and most of the companies can benefit from this change, the lecturer believes that this alteration does not have any profits for companies. In the following, I will try to substantiate to reasons of both the passage and the talk.
At the first, according to the reading, changing five-day workweek to four-day one has not more payment to the companies, and the costs will not increase. On the other hand, the professor announces that it forces the factories to pay more money for employees due to medical cost which is same for every employee. Employees can equally benefit from medical health option. Moreover, peforming this rule, there will be need to more computers and other practical tools than previous.
Secondly, the author acclaims that by fulfilling this policy, the employees will be able to have more time to rest and werlfare, and this leads them to reduce their errors. In contrast, the professor proclaims that the employees can not follow their duties properly. Also, hiring new workers will be costly, and new policy will raise their expectations.
Finally, the author declares that employees can have more free time with their families, and they can use it for entertainment and having fun. The professor, however, believes that it would be risky. It might cause reduction in their lives quality. 5-day manager will be needed to control the workers as well.
- TPO1Employee, four-day workweek, united states, 80 percent, four-fifth 3
- TPO51the movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects 66
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- bee, Arizona, flowering plants, actual bees fossils, nest chambers 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9304029304 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49183884404 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4440520762 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1428571429 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997010912943 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349007692375 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757086317485 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618606661048 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052667816564 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.