tpo21
The reading specifies that there are three characteristics in planting genetically modified tree. However, the professor assert that although genetic modification has some benefits, it has serious problem and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, author explains that genetically modified trees are harder than natural trees and this feature helps them to survive. Conversely, the professor opposes this idea by saying that it is true that typical trees destroy easily but few of them do not die. Hence, they do not extinct. On the other hand, genetic trees are uniform and if they expose to a counterparts which they did not design for it, all off them will die.
Second, based on the reading, genetically modified have some economic benefits for farmer who grow them. One of this benefits is that they tend to grow faster and other one is that they produce more yields of food. Nevertheless, the lecturer states that trees which genetically modified, cost more than typical tree. The farmer should pay more money for their seeds and also when they developed, the farmer must pay money to company each time they want to plant it seeds.
Third, according to the passage, growing demant for the wood causes many forest around the world being cut down and genetically modified trees help us replace them rapidly and satisfy our need for wood. Also it help us to save native and unique species of tree which is engendered by cutting. In contrast, the lecturer contradicts this point by reasoning that this kind of tree makes more damage than nature tree becaue it grows more aggressively and it do not give chance to natural tree to grow by competing with them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
- TPO 6 Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 60
- TPO 3 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 66
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 76
- Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a counterpart' or simply 'counterparts'?
Suggestion: a counterpart; counterparts
...trees are uniform and if they expose to a counterparts which they did not design for it, all o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nefits for farmer who grow them. One of this benefits is that they tend to grow fast...
^^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... rapidly and satisfy our need for wood. Also it help us to save native and unique sp...
^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... and satisfy our need for wood. Also it help us to save native and unique species of...
^^^^
Line 4, column 454, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...ecaue it grows more aggressively and it do not give chance to natural tree to grow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in contrast, kind of, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90175438596 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43075604414 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8678934058 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491534776507 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181909846977 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951776159018 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301984423572 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064095994366 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.