Tpo32
In this set of material, the lecture and the article disagree on the merit of the source of quackers sounds which the Russian submarines hear them while patrolling the North Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean. The reading passage suggests three theories explaining the moving fast sounds. In contrary, the professor in the lecture challenges these ideas and proves they are not feasible. Following is a brief explanation of his perspective.
First of all, the passage states that the weird sounds could be the calls of males and female Ocra whales submarine animal which inhabit that area. Based on the extensive studies of that sub-animal, the author believes that the female attract her mate in the similar voice of that noise. However, the lecture opposed this idea of the passage. He asserts that it is plausible to this Whales to create that sound in that area, but the sounds of them produced near the surface of the ocean which is impossible to hear it with that bright voice from above the surface.
Secondly, the reading claims that this sound caused from a giant squid submarine as particular kind of frogs. Furthermore, there is not that much study to that species of frogs, but the sound could be from them. On the other hand, continue listening passage refutes this theory. It points out that those squids live in that area for centuries, and the first recording of that sounds was at 1960 and continued for two decades, after that the voice suddenly disappeared. In fact, there is no reason to the disappearance of that noise while the animals still living there. It is clearly for the lecturer that the voice is not from those frogs.
Finally, the reading passage suggests that this strange sound could be an undetected advanced technological device which creates a free sound similar to the frog's voice. Whereas, the professor casts doubt this theory. He elaborates that there is no device invented that does not include a noise of its engine. Moreover, there is no technology in the past capable of developing such a quiet engine in the submarine environment. Therefore, this theory is unconvincing also.
All in all, the lecture rebuffs the three arguments of the article and explains why they are detrimental.
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children's behavior 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Businesses should do anything to make a profit.Use specific reasons and example to support your position. 70
- Do you A/D? extended families are not important these days as they were in the past.Give specific reasons to support. 70
- Tpo32 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...age. He asserts that it is plausible to this Whales to create that sound in that are...
^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... free sound similar to the frogs voice. Whereas, the professor casts doubt this theory....
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... Therefore, this theory is unconvincing also. All in all, the lecture rebuffs the t...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'while', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239130434783 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.132850241546 0.158904122519 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0700483091787 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0434782608696 0.0435111971325 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0338164251208 0.0277247811725 122% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13768115942 0.128828473217 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0217391304348 0.0370669169778 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51725597366 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0144927536232 0.0208969081088 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0024154589372 0.00154638098197 156% => OK
Determiners: 0.173913043478 0.128158765124 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00724637681159 0.0158828679856 46% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.012077294686 0.0114777025283 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2223.0 1645.83664459 135% => OK
No of words: 376.0 271.125827815 139% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91223404255 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.04852973271 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340425531915 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25 0.287516216867 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156914893617 0.187439937562 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103723404255 0.113142543107 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51725597366 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51329787234 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 55.6338098942 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0529801325 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5858507732 49.3711431718 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.15 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 0.878197800319 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 43.8 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.89655172414 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.667054996959 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0973891423088 0.142949733639 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.080749604566 0.0787303798458 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572404970637 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.200258767085 0.139662658121 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290910339624 0.266732575781 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137075895373 0.103435571967 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.476215558571 0.414875509568 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.166275323453 0.0530846634433 313% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.482785069707 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101264958851 0.0528353158467 192% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 10.2958057395 175% => OK
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.