TPO32

Essay topics:

TPO32

The author of the reading passage and the lecturer both discuss the odd sound, known as quackers, occurring under the water. The author expresses that there are several theories about what might have caused these sounds. However, the lecturer casts doubt on these hypotheses and refutes each of the author's theories by providing several counter-arguments.

First of all, the author mentions that the strange noises might be caused by the orca whales during their courtship ritual, and the sounds they make actually are similar to those that the submarines were detecting. On the contrary, the lecturer disputes that the Orah whales live near the surface of the water and the submarines are in the deep water. So the strange sounds cannot be Orah whales' sounds.

Secondly, the author thinks that the sound might be made by the giant squids. These squids might emit sounds and approach the submarines out of curiosity. However, the lecturer states squids live underwater constantly for a long time, but there is a certain period of time that the sounds disappeared. So if the sounds were produced by the squids, there would have no reason that the sounds disappeared.

Finally, the author indicates that the sounds may be emitted by the foreign submarines unintentionally. By contrast, the lecturer points out that if the sounds were emitted by the other submarines, the submarines must have turned fast to move around. However, the technology now cannot invent such advanced submarines that turn so fast to move around. What is more, the sound should have been accompanied by the noise engine sounds emitted by the submarines. Still, there were no signs of the engine sounds. Therefore, the lecturer believes that the sounds are not produced by the foreign submarines.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-09 Zmx_6 80 view
2022-09-19 TTTTTTTTC 85 view
2022-05-08 lhklin 75 view
2021-09-22 atefehndi 70 view
2021-09-12 Maryam_zn 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...for a long time, but there is a certain period of time that the sounds disappeared. So if the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, first of all, on the contrary, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1275862069 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61088228421 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472413793103 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6968492925 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9375 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439684616546 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158938562407 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896828611892 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267785121957 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868909316587 0.0443174109184 196% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.