Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that is a good quality for a person
Making a crucial decision has been long considered the time-wasting process. Indeed, when contemplating on a crucial decision, people usually spend a great amount of time as they do not want to make any mistakes. In such case, contrary to common belief, from my perspective, spending a great deal of time on making a crucial decision is a good quality for a person to have.
First of all, if a person spends a significant time on making important decisions, it means that this person wants to make his/her decision comprehensive, which is certainly a good quality for a person. In other words, people, from time to time, need to make important decisions which might then affect their life in the future. As a result, they have to double-check that the decisions are perfect from different perspectives, which really takes time to achieve. Take myself as an example. After I graduated from senior high school, I had to decide which college I should go. Because this decision would undoubtedly influence my future life, I needed to ponder it from every angles such as the faculties in the college, the quality of the facilities and the reputation of the college. Thus, taking much time on making decisions reveals that I have the ability of making decisions from every angle.
In the second place, making decisions for a long time also represents a person’s good quality of pursuing perfection. To illustrate more, if a person takes a considerable time on making a critical decision, this person steps up his/her efforts to make this decision flawless. An obvious example is one of my friend, Jason, who is a perfectionist. Every time when he is making decisions, he always spends a large amount of time on correcting and rethinking the decisions. After a long time of repeatedly thinking and correcting, his decision is always so excellent that there are no mistakes. Therefore, this example clearly shows that making decisions for a long time can mean the quality of seeking perfection.
In contrast, there is a common opinion that spending too much time on making decisions is a bad quality of a person to have since it means that this person do not have the ability of making right decisions quickly. However, based on my observation, indeed, a person can simply make a quick decision, but this decision will be full of drawbacks and pitfalls, being of no value. For instance, my friend, willy, who always makes important decisions such as choosing his major subjects in a fraction of second without deeply brooding the decisions. As a consequence, his decisions are always made of faults and defects, causing him to suffer in the future.
To sum up, taking a lot of time making decisions represents a person’s good quality as it also means this person makes decision from various angles. In addition, making decision for a long time also reveals a person’s quality of pursuing perfection. Finally, although some people might view this as a bad quality to have, I disagree with them and think that it means a person is of perfection and has the ability of considering things from different angles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | BearTien | 68 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Hellen Yuan | 73 | view |
| 2017-12-03 | Jason bang | 44 | view |
| 2016-09-29 | shshadi | 85 | view |
| 2016-09-27 | shshadi | 85 | view |
- TPO 35- Task 1 68
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 80
- The most important thing that government should do to improve the heath care is to clean the environment 88
- TPO32 73
- tpo 35 real 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93738140417 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83314099303 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421252371917 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4189030005 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.130434783 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9130434783 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91304347826 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496698552263 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166515161985 0.076458572812 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113642957859 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331930476981 0.150856017488 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799224567051 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.