TPO39
In the set of materials, the reading passage argues about mass extinction that occurs 200 million years ago and provides some explanation about reasons that causes this mass extinction. The listening passage talks about the same issue but adding some new explanation to retort the author climes.
The reading passage provides three explanations about the causes of mass extinction. The first theory is the decline of sea levels and causes to destroy the habitats of the ocean population that lived in the shallow water and coast. The second theory is massive climate cooling, the volcanic activity at that time produce so2 that cause to lowering the global temperature. The last theory is hitting the asteroid strike that causes to release the amount of soil and crushed rock that blocked the sunlight. finally, all the theory’s caused to massive extinction.
The listening passage says that none of the theory’s that explained in the reading passage aren’t convincing. In the first theory all the coast and shallow waters habitats adopted to live in the land, therefore the first idea of reading a passage in proved unconvincing. the second so2 can combine in ocean water, so the writer’s second idea is rebutted. finally, at that time don’t date any asteroid hitting with the earth. Thus, reliably retorted the last argument in the reading passage.
To sum it all by taking all the detail into consideration the reading passage information can’t explain the mass extinction’s cusses. And the argument in the reading passage isn’t convincing
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ns about the causes of mass extinction. The first theory is the decline of sea leve...
^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destroying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: destroying
...is the decline of sea levels and causes to destroy the habitats of the ocean population th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t lived in the shallow water and coast. The second theory is massive climate coolin...
^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...se to lowering the global temperature. The last theory is hitting the asteroid str...
^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'releasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: releasing
...hitting the asteroid strike that causes to release the amount of soil and crushed rock tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...crushed rock that blocked the sunlight. finally, all the theory's caused to massiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ading a passage in proved unconvincing. the second so2 can combine in ocean water, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
... writer's second idea is rebutted. finally, at that time don't date any aster...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35059760956 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81443579999 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501992031873 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0272013983 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9285714286 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.