TPO5
The reading explains that the settlements of Chaco Canyon were used for residential by great number of people. In contrast, the professor cast doubt on it and says that none of the theories mentioned by reading is not convincing.
Frist, Based on the reading, hundreds of people residents in The Chaco structures.However, the lecturer states that the outside of the structure are like apartment but there are doubt in inside of the structure to be considered apartment. There is only few rooms and fire place insdie this building and since people need fire for cocking, we can not consider that hundred of people use it at residental housing.
Second, according to the passage, the Chaco structure were used to save food supplies since the people use the main graze which last for a long time. Nevertheless, the professore explains that by excavation we did not found many other things like the container of the grain maize. It is possible that the maize spoil on the floor by people. Therefore, we can not conclude that the people use it as food supplies.
Third, the reading specifies that houses were used as ceremonial center since by excavation of that places, they found many pots. On the contrary, the explainer says that lots of other materials like building materials such as sand and stone was found in these places. Therefore, it is a chance that people put their structure trash material, not used material or regular trash in these places. Hence, the left over meal can not support the usage of this building for ceremonies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...eople residents in The Chaco structures.However, the lecturer states that the outside o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88167938931 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64703118243 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519083969466 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5950624763 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.583333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.