TPO59
The reading text and lecture are both about the large plain of Jar found by the archaeologist near by the Southeastern Asia country Laos. While, the author presents some theories about the real purpose of these jars, the lecturer disputes all these theories and claim that real purpose of these jars is still mystery for the scientists.
First of all, reading suggests that, ancient peoples were used this jar for the fermentation process. It is also states that, these jars were constructed by the king to prepare the drink at time celebration of the victory. However, the lecturer refutes this claim and argue that, the original fermentation vessels are made from the clay, But this jar is made up of the stone. It is very expensive and time-consuming top make stone jar for fermentation. Additionally, He said that, if there is east way was available for the construction of the clay vessels, then why the they choose that tough way of fermentation.
Secondly, reading text claim that, major purpose of these jars was the water storage. Travelers were using this water during their migration for making trade. In contrast to that, professor points out that, trade route on which those travelers were travelled was near by the river. So, they did not require any additional source of water during their travelling hours.
In last, writer believes that, Jars are originally used for as the tomb, to store the human remaining like some precious artifacts. On the other hand, tutor is opposing this claim and goes on to say that, if those jars were used as a storage purpose of some valuables like beads, golden artifacts, then it must have the lead to cover the jar. Although, the archaeologists who are working on that site has not found anu kind of cover, not even in the nearby area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heartqq | 68 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heartqq | 68 | view |
- pruning 61
- TPO 67 60
- Wilderness management has advanced greatly over the last century due in part to such practices as the suppression of forest fires and limitations on the clear cutting of trees Monitoring forests for small brushfires is easier with aircraft as is the use o 73
- Ingrate the author s view and lecturer s opinion 76
- Pruning technique in plant raising 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...plain of Jar found by the archaeologist near by the Southeastern Asia country Laos. Whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...struction of the clay vessels, then why the they choose that tough way of fermentation. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...hich those travelers were travelled was near by the river. So, they did not require any...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in contrast, kind of, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85667752443 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54793928696 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557003257329 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1507928855 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348904277132 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129540926699 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549828304769 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205459918515 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283670591399 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.