The article states that storing patients' medical records in electronic databases has several benefits over the traditional paper-based storing system and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecture explains that it is very uncertainly and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that storing records in electronic databases will reduce costs by saving money and spaces. The lecture refutes this point by stating that it has unlikely significance as stated in the article. Actually, there will be no saving. Because the doctors who are also adopted with electronic storing will not throw the paper. They will keep paper records as a backup. Paper-based records can be used for signature verifications. So, doctors need to pay for storing the paper-based backup.
Second, the article posits that electronic medical records are crucial to reducing the chance of medical errors. However, the lecture contends that it can not eliminate the chance of medicals errors. Doctors use pen and paper to see patients and also write the prescribe by hand. Normally, medical records are keeping in the electronic database later from papers by assistants. So, there is a chance to error to put error data for poor handwriting.
Third, the reading avers that this will help to aid research. The lecture opposes this point but saying that it will not beneficial for research. In USA medical policies it is too difficult to access medical records databases. There are strict policies to confide the patient's data. So, if someone wants to get a permit to acess database, he has to go through with some complex procedures. For this, permission can not be granted. On the other hand, a patient can also block the pass of the database so that no one can access their medical records.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. 73
- Tpo 38In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves with 3
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cle. Actually, there will be no saving. Because the doctors who are also adopted with e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd paper to see patients and also write the prescribe by hand. Normally, medical records are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...here are strict policies to confide the patients data. So, if someone wants to get a per...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12203389831 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59206576713 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518644067797 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7928865839 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9523809524 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0476190476 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308439858537 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917623472705 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864465855415 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208545449239 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645965132602 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.