us wood company eco-friendly certification
The article states that wood companies want to obtain certification which is highly regarded in advertising wood products to consumers from the international organization and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the companies don't treat consumers and international organization for several ways and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, The reading claims that american people don't pay attention too much on the label of companies because of not believe in the advertisement. The professor refutes this point by saying that the companies distinguish between products to advertising to users and own products to evaluated from the independent consumer agency. Besides, he identifies that they react very favourable on the trustworthy of the international organization.
Secondly, the article posits that the eco-friendly wood is much more expensive than uncertified wood and americans are highly sensitive to the price of goods. Yet, The lecturer says that it is true about the price is highly affected by the decision of buying a commodity but the americans prefer the value of impact on the environment to the goods’ price.
Thirdly, the passage claims that most of the people think that the development of international relation is key to success in business but american wood companies sell most of the products in own country. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the us government should regulate the competition between companies than consumers. he also clarifies if the us companies wouldn’t ensure domestic demand they confronted the serious problem.
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
- us wood company eco-friendly certification 80
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, 90
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 76
- TPO 7 integrated: receiving the eco-certification in wood companies of United States 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e professor explains that the companies dont treat consumers and international organ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...The reading claims that american people dont pay attention too much on the label of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ition between companies than consumers. he also clarifies if the us companies woul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54581673307 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0733068762 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1495376926 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.2 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288973166948 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953374134125 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764081984718 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145470728223 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515681590715 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.