Visual spatial intelligence
According to the lecture, professor illustrates visual-spatial intelligence by explaning its importance in the game of chess. Furthermore, he states some examples in the chess game that it related to the visual-spatial intelligence. Generally the points in the lecture proves the points in the reading.
First, the lecture state the chess masters can draw a picture of chessboard they have seen for just a few second if the pieces are set in meaningful position. Thus, this shows the clues in the reading that people with visual-spatial intelligence are able to perceive patterns and draw objects after seeing them for only a short time.
Second, the lecture believes that a blindfolded chess player has to remember the movements of the chess pieces and hold a picture if the chessboard into the mind. Also this issue explain in to the reading that people with visual-spatial intelligence have the ability to create and transform mental imagery.
Third, the lecture states that chess players remember plan, strategies and patterns of reasoning of important games that they have played. This subject proves in the reading because this issue explain that peole with visual-spatial intelligence have superior visual memory and the ability tk predict and plan ahead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-18 | meet96301 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 68 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 68 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun second seems to be countable; consider using: 'few seconds'.
Suggestion: few seconds
...of chessboard they have seen for just a few second if the pieces are set in meaningful pos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...icture if the chessboard into the mind. Also this issue explain in to the reading th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, third, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35820895522 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94180076279 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8058260408 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362473348328 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171484886022 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158610568911 0.0662205650399 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251761612528 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613877449461 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.