Visual-spatial Intelligence
Summarize the points made in the passage, and illustrate how the specific points made in the lecture explain the concept.
The reading passage and the lecture are both about visual-spatial intelligence. The author in the passage represents some of the abilities such as recognizing patterns, mental capacities to create and transform imagery of the objects, and superior visual memory that allow a person with visual-spatial intelligence to predict and plan actions. The lecturer uses an example of a chess player to illustrate these concepts.
To begin with, it is noted in the passage that a person with this kind of intelligence would be able to notice non-symmetry in a building, painting, or face fairly easily. They can recognize the objects even when the position is changed. This enables them to draw such objects after seeing them for a short time. The lecturer explains that in the game of chess, a player can remember the chessboard with particular meaningful positions of pieces pertaining to some strategy. She goes on to say that in a form of chess called "Blindfold Chess", a player plays multiple games each with a different opponent. In such cases, the only information that a player has is the last move of their opponent. Their visual-spatial intelligence helps them to remember the positions and states in multiple games simultaneously.
Secondly, the author notes that a person with said abilities will have certain exceptional mental capacities such as creating mental imagery, mentally rotating the object in complex forms to see it from various angles, and drawing a picture of this spatial information. The lecturer illustrates this point by saying that a chess player not only recalls the sequence of moves but also recognizes the patterns with reasoning. A player is able to look through plans and strategies and perceive the characteristics of each strategy.
Lastly, the author mentions the superior visual memory that a person with such intelligence has that helps him or her to predict and plan the actions, and analyze the consequences accordingly. The lecturer talks about how a chess player is able to recall a certain move with respect to the strategy it is part of, and that too, earlier in time. A chess player would know why a particular move is necessary to play a given strategy.
To sum up, the author discussed the exceptional abilities that a person with visual-spatial intelligence possesses, and the lecturer elaborated on it with an example of a chess player.
- There are times when it is acceptable not to tell the truth 87
- Earthworms and its effects on soil plants and animals 78
- Do you agree or disagree Good teachers set challenging tasks for their students Give a specific example and reasons to support your claim 86
- Believing or not the newspapers 73
- It is more important to work at a job that you enjoy even if the salary is low Than it is to have a high paying job that you do not enjoy 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e. The author in the passage represents some of the abilities such as recognizing patterns,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...telligence to predict and plan actions. The lecturer uses an example of a chess pla...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 391.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15089514066 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03275852913 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475703324808 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0372284151 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.470588235 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158917881202 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595462487177 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585638601347 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107967373258 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537038834525 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.