Wilderness management has advanced
greatly over the last century, due in part
to such practices as the suppression of
forest fires and limitations on the clearcutting of trees. Monitoring forests
for small brushfires is easier with
aircraft, as is the use of large amounts
of water and sophisticated chemical
fire extinguishers to prevent fires from
spreading.
The goals of decreasing the amount
of destruction by fires and cutting
are wide-ranging. One is simply the
longer lives and improved health of
trees. In some areas of hickory and
oak forest on the Eastern Seaboard,
fire suppression has allowed the
maturation of so many trees that the
treetops form
a continuous canopy.
There is evidence of the healthful
effects of fire suppression closer to
the ground as well. Vines and low
bushes that would be burned out in
a
forest fire can flourish when fires are
suppressed, of course, but there is a more indirect way fires harm plant
life. Chemical tests on areas that
have recently experienced forest fires
demonstrate that burning decreases
the overall amount of nutrients in the
soil. Suppressing fires prevents such a decrease. Ferns, wildflowers, and
herbs grow without disturbance.
Finally, wildlife can benefit. In the
eastern hickory and oak forests, the
suppression of fires has meant that
forest animals
—ranging from small
insects and birds to large deer and,
bears
—are not burned to death.
Deer populations, in particular, have
increased notably.
The reading text ad lecture are both about the suppression of forest fires. The author of this text feels that, because of this forest grows with its full potential. The lecture disputes all these claims made by the author. She says that, forest fire is beneficial for the forest.
First of all, according to reading text lower down the rate of fire is allow the tree to be mature. In contrast the lecturer stance that, this mature tree is making the thick canopy over the forest land. She also stats that, it will not allow the light to penetrate across the canopy. It will harm the young growing plant in the forest reducing it photosynthesis.
Secondly, The reading text suggests that, limitation over the fire is allow the bushes and herbs to grow at their full potential. On the other hand, the lecturer posits that, unlimited growth of the bushes leads to the total covering of the land area. Additionally, She poins out that, it will causes a competition between the young plant and this bushes.
Finally, The reading passage mention that, as a result, of reduction in forest fire incidences, the population of wildlife animal is increasing. However, the lecturer goes to says that, this animal is mainly dependes on the young growing tree for their food. So, it will destruct the young plant by feed on it.
Moreover, she says that, decreasing in the forest fire is also reduce the quantity of nutrients in the soil.
Put it in a nutshell, the reading text and lecture are both about the pros and cons of the forest fire although, the lecturer is effectively challenge the all the main points made by the author in the reading text.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | Yash Mehta | 71 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | Jimmy0807 | 78 | view |
- In 1939 an archaeological excavation in southeastern England revealed a grave dating to the seventh century CE The grave contained a 13 meter long ship filled with jewelry and other precious objects The presence of such impressive artifacts made it likely 3
- Integrated task 3
- There are more numbers of car in just recent year than last 20 years Agree or Disagree 66
- TPO60 3
- You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage Typically an effect 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s forest grows with its full potential. The lecture disputes all these claims made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allowed'.
Suggestion: allowed
...ing text lower down the rate of fire is allow the tree to be mature. In contrast the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...fire is allow the tree to be mature. In contrast the lecturer stance that, this mature t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allowed'.
Suggestion: allowed
...gests that, limitation over the fire is allow the bushes and herbs to grow at their f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ditionally, She poins out that, it will causes a competition between the young plant a...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
..., decreasing in the forest fire is also reduce the quantity of nutrients in the soil....
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reduce the quantity of nutrients in the soil. Put it in a nutshell, the readi...
^^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'challenged'.
Suggestion: challenged
...e although, the lecturer is effectively challenge the all the main points made by the aut...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75694444444 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38529283602 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9482328707 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.625 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150719356427 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628084954221 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571388042994 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923142641978 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429208514619 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.