work 4 days of week instead of 5 days of week.
The reading specifies that it is better for employees to work four days a week instead of five days. However, the professor casts doubt on this claim and provides three reasons to reject the mentioned point in the reading.
First, based on the reading, employees feel more rested and alert with shortened workweek and because of that, the company does not need to hire additional persons to accomplish the same amount of work. In contrast, the lecturer says that declining the working hours will not lead to not hiring employees. The company will need to add new workers which can be costly since they need health insurance, computer, and space to work in that environment.
Second, the reading specifies that offering a lesser workweek will diminish the unemployment rate since it is necessary to hire more people to do workload. Nevertheless, the professor implies that because of the cost of hiring new employees, no additional jobs will be created by this method. Also, the employee will force them to work overtime to finish their job which can make their situation very unpleasant.
Third, according to the reading, the option of a four-day workweek will enhance the quality of employees' life, because not only they can spend extra time with their family but also, they can pursue their interests. On the other hand, the man explains there is a risk that can reduce the quality of employees' work and job stability which can make them fired. Also, since the supervision position needs to work 5 days a week, the people will lose their chance to advance in their job.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 71
- TPO4 3
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87686567164 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45961760381 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.222081729 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192879313958 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866171447652 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1283279134 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134491402317 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101874013917 0.0443174109184 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.