The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The table compares the numbers of people who cycled to work in twelve areas of the UK in the years 2001 and 2011.
Overall, the number of UK commuters who travelled to work by bicycle rose considerably over the 10-year period. Inner London had by far the highest number of cycling commuters in both years.
In 2001, well over 43 thousand residents of inner London commuted by bicycle, and this figure rose to more than 106 thousand in 2011, an increase of 144%. By contrast, although outer London had the second highest number of cycling commuters in each year, the percentage change, at only 45%, was the lowest of the twelve areas shown in the table.
Brighton and Hove saw the second biggest increase (109%) in the number of residents cycling to work, but Bristol was the UK’s second city in terms of total numbers of cycling commuters, with 8,108 in 2001 and 15,768 in 2011. Figures for the other eight areas were below the 10 thousand mark in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-06 | Joel James | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | sanjana rani | 73 | view |
- discuss the advantages and disadvantages of internet 70
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment. It would be better to encourage them to spend more time outside playing sports and games. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion. (SAMPLE) 90
- Some people think that it is acceptable to use the animals in any way for benefit od human being. While others think that it is not justifiable discuss both sides and give your opinion. 60
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 80
- Motivation Letters 63
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 764 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.468 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.18 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 34 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 9 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.022 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.492 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.757 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4