Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
The human disaster moves in different way as the world’s economic development. Increasing the amount of malnutrition people and famine sufferers as an impact of natural disaster, especially drought and flood, and bad education systems, stimulates the sense of humanity in the most countries. Some citizens said that is a nationality problem that should be solved by its country, but others believe on the names of humanity, other countries, particularly which is wealthy, have to assist the trouble countries.
The problems in food and education commonly emerge in poor countries, affected by natural disaster or war or both of them. The government has a responsibility to overcome this incident, even by itself or request for a hand from the other countries by the agreement that should be done before. For the rich countries, help the poor countries always depend on the conditions and triggers.
In the other words, the wealth countries usually bare a hand in case of food and education as an agreement in United Nation. For the example, many countries support primary needs and build education center in Gaza along and the end of the war. Aids also tailoring to the some countries in Africa that their citizens live in low-nutrition foods and not educated well.
In fact, all of the aids that addresses to poor countries are not free and contain a political reciprocation. The confederation countries always have a bilateral or multilateral approval that regulate the supporting systems among them. In addition, mob rule still exist and all of countries want to be the one, to be the highest class of the country.
In conclusion, the government can not solve the national problems and need help to other countries, mainly in food and education. I entirely agree if the countries help each other to create a world without famine and stupidity, but totally against that decision if political and desire to conquer other countries are the excuse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
- Universities should accept equal members of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that it heard everywhere nowadays? 60
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 60
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 60
The human disaster moves in different way
Human disasters move in different ways
other countries, particularly which is wealthy,
other countries, particularly which are wealthy,
Aids also tailoring to the some countries
Aids are also tailoring to the some countries
a bilateral or multilateral approval that regulate the supporting systems
a bilateral or multilateral approval that regulates the supporting systems
Sentence: I entirely agree if the countries help each other to create a world without famine and stupidity, but totally against that decision if political and desire to conquer other countries are the excuse.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1591 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.956 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.762 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.649 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.365 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.623 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5