The following appeared as part of an article in a weekly newsmagazine:
“The country of Oleum can best solve the problem of its balance of trade deficit by further increasing the tax on its
major import, crude oil. After Oleum increased the tax on imported crude oil four months ago, consumption of
gasoline declined by 20 percent. Therefore, by imposing a second and significantly higher tax increase next year,
Oleum will dramatically decrease its balance of trade deficit.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
the author avers that Oleum will decrease its balance of trade deficit by imposing higher tax increase next year. To support this assertion the author states that last year in oleum, consumption of gasoline declined by 20 percent when tax on its import increased . the argument if full of flaws and is open to a lot of question since it provides meager assertion and dubious assumptions.
First the author failed to take into account the impact of using less crude oil. It might be possible that less usage of oil will affect the overall export. Since oil prices have risen, the total overall export also experienced a sharp decline. if export are reduced by the same rate by which import increased then trade deficit will continue to be high.
Second the author states that increasing the tax on the major import is the oly reason to solve the problem of trade deficit.the author does not provide any evidences to support this assertion. It could be that demand of export items have declined due to inferior quality and high cost. So by improving the quality and reducing the export duties it can solve the problem of trade deficit. if so then it will weakened the argument.
Third the author addresses that imposing higher tax will decrease its balance of trade deficit. This is irrelogical and unsupported as the author failed to answer several important questions such as what is the surity that it will not affect the export? whether the usage of oil has hit the threshhold?.As the author failed to answer these question one is left is the claim that it is more of a wishfull thinking rather substantative evidences. So the argument has no legs to stand on.
Because author left out key issues it is not sound or persuasive. the argument is full of assumptions where author has assumed alot of unsubstantiated evidences . had the author included above mentioned points into view, the argument would have been incontrovertible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-29 | abhishekrukhaiyar | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as part of an article in a weekly newsmagazine:“The country of Oleum can best solve the problem of its balance of trade deficit by further increasing the tax on itsmajor import, crude oil. After Oleum increased the tax on imported c 70
- Manufacturing:“Managers at our central office report that their employees tend to be most productive in the days immediately preceding a vacation. To help counteract our declining market share, we could increase the productivity of our professional staff 30
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the managing director of the Exeunt Theater Company:“Now that we have moved to a larger theater, we can expect to increase our revenues from ticket sales. To further increase profits, we should start produ 80
Sentence: So by improving the quality and reducing the export duties it can solve the problem of trade deficit. if so then it will weakened the argument.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to will and weakened
Sentence: Second the author states that increasing the tax on the major import is the oly reason to solve the problem of trade deficit.the author does not provide any evidences to support this assertion.
Error: oly Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: This is irrelogical and unsupported as the author failed to answer several important questions such as what is the surity that it will not affect the export? whether the usage of oil has hit the threshhold?.As the author failed to answer these question one is left is the claim that it is more of a wishfull thinking rather substantative evidences.
Error: irrelogical Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: wishfull Suggestion: wishful
Error: substantative Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: threshhold Suggestion: threshold
Error: surity Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Because author left out key issues it is not sound or persuasive. the argument is full of assumptions where author has assumed alot of unsubstantiated evidences . had the author included above mentioned points into view, the argument would have been incontrovertible.
Error: alot Suggestion: No alternate word
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
---------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1573 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.752 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.51 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.218 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.391 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.652 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5