The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trios taken by drivers in 2005.
The bar graph elucidates the percentage of reasons for taking a car trip by genders in 2005.
It is evident from the graph that, the work purpose was dominated by men drivers, with the percentage of over 50. The recreation purpose had the second highest place of around 11%. The highest purpose for the women drivers to take the car was for the work but less frequent than men drivers (around 40%) . Women drove the car very often, less than 20% of their times for the shopping. Courses purpose was recorded at around 14% for women drivers.
The rest of reasons were reached at below 10% of car usages in 2005. Bank and running errands took 10% of women time to drive the car whilst close to 0% of men spent their time on those purposes. Just below 10% of women drove the car to visit their friends compared to half of those for men. Visiting towns were most popular reasons among men drivers - 10% compared to 5% for women.
Both genders experienced the most of car used for the work. While the shopping dominated the reasons for women to use a car, most men drove the car for recreational purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-28 | Malita | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | mifas meleraroth | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 80
- How people invested money in stocks and bonds in Some country from 2001 to 2006. 70
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 93
- As languages such as English Spanish and Mandarin become more widely spoken there is a fear that many minority languages may die out Some countries have taken steps to protect minority languages 60
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the year 2009. 70
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.71 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 201 200
No. of Characters: 865 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.765 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.303 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.154 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 16 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 8 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.71 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4