Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, in our agitated daily live, common tasks like preparing food for our family has taken a secondary role in our life. The skinny schedule that working people have in their life, taken them away such a pleasant chore. For this reason, other solutions have been built to make the time of preparing food shorter. But, have those changes improved our way of living? I do not think so, I will explaining my arguments in the next paragraphs.
Firstly, one of the main solutions people choose is the fast food. It is widely known all the grease and unhealthy ingredients those kinds of nutrients have which are dangerous to our organism. Many medical problems like obesity and diabetes are caused by the consumption of fast food. It is true that by the hectic schedule that many of us have, this option saves a lot of time but we should avoid it most of the time.
Secondly, we have pre-made food. Despite all the advertisements around these products, their effects in our health are similar to the fast food ones. Most of those nutrients are superficially flavored with chemical spices without knowing their effects in the human organism. Moreover, with the motif of improving the production of food, many vegetables and fruits are nurtured with chemical toxins to make the harvest faster, and those products are food of the stocks, poultry, etc…, all of them principal ingredients of our daily diet.
Last but not least, there are the different devised devices for make the cooking process faster. One of the most used is the microwave. This artifact, perhaps all the benefits it has at the time of preparing our plates, has hazardous effects in our organisms. For example, the waves spared by this device, as time goes by, can cause infertility to our genitals organs just like cerebral complications and even it can generate deformations in babies when the pregnant woman pass to much time receiving this kind of wave.
To sum up, the solutions that humankind have brought to relieve the time of preparing food are not as good for our life as many of us think. We need to be precautious before all the hazards these alternatives can have for our health. If we have the time for cooking we better do it in the “old way”, it will be a lot healthier and our family will be more grateful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Pandalove | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Emn96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | mike.sharko | 66 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | khosrow nouroozi | 70 | view |
- Workers would be more satisfied if they have various kinds of work to do during workday instead of doing the same job all day long. Are you agree or disagree? 35
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 70
- What do you think about homophobia? 70
- What do you think about abortion? 60
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...ay of living? I do not think so, I will explaining my arguments in the next paragraphs. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... in babies when the pregnant woman pass to much time receiving this kind of wave. ...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much time receiving this kind of wave. To sum up, the solutions that humankind ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for example', 'kind of', 'it is true', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230598669623 0.229887763892 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.146341463415 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0953436807095 0.0866891130778 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0354767184035 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0776053215078 0.0685040099705 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126385809313 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0443458980044 0.0351676179071 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54383647969 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.019955654102 0.0309702414327 64% => OK
Particles: 0.00221729490022 0.00188951952338 117% => OK
Determiners: 0.09977827051 0.0887237588012 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0155210643016 0.0209618222197 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00665188470067 0.0139019557991 48% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2312.0 2387.08602151 97% => OK
No of words: 401.0 408.028673835 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76558603491 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.309226932668 0.338922669872 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244389027431 0.251872472559 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16957605985 0.174417080927 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114713216958 0.112833075102 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54383647969 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513715710723 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 56.8827572236 59.2087087015 96% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.05 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3215226139 48.84282405 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 120.699889404 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.644075263715 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 44.4889027431 45.7405998639 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.54700854701 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206662731871 0.300154397459 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113115971183 0.103427244359 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0649838592383 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.53352079128 0.497263757937 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14315696698 0.151897553556 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843652743224 0.114077575197 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376977860322 0.0781384742642 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375649632625 0.336927656856 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0748519460103 0.067059652881 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144793958265 0.210909579961 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211975689346 0.0618886996521 34% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.